With the expiration of the 2020-2024 UNL-NFU-UKB-NWO-Elsevier agreement, also the Open Science pilot program will end. 

We thank all the participating institutions, the members of the steering group and executive board, and the pilot participants for their ongoing commitment that made this unique collaboration a success. In total 8 pilots ran with nearly 60 participating institutions. For an evaluation of the pilots please see: here

Please be advised that the pilots will be discontinued by end of December 2024 unless otherwise communicated with the participating institutions

If you would like to discuss the continuation of EquipmentMonitor, Author Disambiguation Service, and/or the (successor of) DataMonitor, please contact: Dino Venturino at d.venturino@elsevier.com.  

Discussions about the continuation of RareDiseaseMonitor (for the NFU members) are ongoing.   

More information about the new 2025-2027 Agreement will be added to the Elsevier  Open Access agreements page in due course.  

The epdos.nl website will continue to be accessible through the first half of 2025.

Open Science Services

The partners are jointly developing various services which aim to support the open science ambitions of the Dutch research community. Services may focus (amongst others) on supporting FAIR data, improving the transparency of the impact of research, supporting reproducibility of research, etcetera.

 

How are pilot projects established?

Any member institution of the partners can suggest ideas for new services. Pilots are considered and approved according to the three-step process below.

  1. Pilot ideation
    • New ideas are discussed amongst the partners and an initiation document is prepared for the initial review by the steering group. Following a positive review, the process moves to the next step.
  2. Pilot validation
    • The steering group approves or rejects the pilot. The decision-making process is supported by a Statement of Work (describing the pilot goals and its deliverables) and a framework document, assessing if the pilot lives up to the collaboration principles.
  3. Pilot evaluation
    • The steering group reviews the evaluation documentation and decides if the pilot met its goals and deliverables. If this is the case the pilot will continue as a “Service” open to all partner institutions for the length of the project.

 

Overview of the services
Name Status Participating Pilot institutions
Website Support Pilot completed, Running as a Service Amsterdam UMC (VU Medical Center, AMC,) VU and University of Amsterdam
Data Monitor Pilot completed, Running as a service VU, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam UMC, University of Groningen, Utrecht University, UMCU, TU
Delft, TU Eindhoven, University of Twente, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Universiteit
Leiden, Tilburg University, Maastricht University, Open University, DANS (the Dutch national centre of
expertise and repository for research data), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Universiteit voor Humanistiek (UvH) and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA)
Grants Monitor Pilot running TU Eindhoven, Utrecht University, Groningen University, TU Delft and AmsterdamUMC, Twente University
Telescope (Equipment Monitor) Pilot completed, Running as a service TU Eindhoven, Wageningen University and Research, GroningenUMC, VU
Rare Disease Monitor Pilot completed, Running as a service ErasmusMC, AmsterdamUMC, UMCGroningen, on behalf of NFU
Preprints Monitor Pilot running Amsterdam UMC, University of Groningen, Utrecht University, TU Eindhoven, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Maastricht University
Author Disambiguation Pilot running Groningen University, TU Delft, VU, TU Eindhoven, Maastricht University
Team Science – author contributor data (CRediT) Pilot running Vrije Universiteit (VU), AmsterdamUMC, Groningen University, Maastricht University, TU Eindhoven
Please click here to find the notes of the pilot evaluation day.

Copyright © The Partners 2022, under a creative commons license

en_USEnglish